Read Kamehasutra Onine

theft of organs from Palestinians It was true then

The method is now standard:

• a Western journalist published an article very embarrassing for Israel section goes almost unnoticed;
• networks Zionist locate the item and a huge rise scandal, the article is immediately accused of anti-Semitism, the Israeli authorities are in the mountains (requiring a conviction in the country where the newspaper is published);
• Western media then refer the matter, but only in terms the charge of anti-Semitism and "tensions" between Israel and Western countries;
• end of the first episode. Nobody cares, obviously, the content "embarrassing" to the original article, investigates the revelations, and simply best to investigate the personality of the journalist and his "network" (genus : the text was taken on the sites "conspiracy" on the Internet, so the journalist is someone fishy);
• then learns a few months after that embarrassing information was true (usually because an Israeli media was checked and if valid Aljazeera such information, it obviously has no interest) and response of Western media: the worst (French situation), virtually no recovery, at best, it evokes information quickly, but trying to identify the effect of this info from "the wrath of the Arab-Muslim world."

The story that interests me today, is that of organ theft from Palestinians killed by Israeli forces.

For the media, the affair begins with the article by Donal Boström in the Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet. The article was translated into French by the network Tlaxcala.

Families in the West Bank and Gaza were sure what had happened to their son: "Our son used as involuntary organ donors," said Khaled near Nablus, as the mother Raed Jenin and uncles and Mahmoud Nafes in the Gaza Strip, which have all disappeared during a number of days before returning at night, killed and autopsied.

"Why else keep the body for at least five days prior to let us bury them? What happened to the body during this period? Why do they perform an autopsy, against our will, when the cause of death is obvious? Why are they made body of night? Why with a military escort? Why is it the area sealed off for the funeral? Why is electricity cut off? "Nafe's uncle was upset and he had many questions.

The article becomes a "case" that when the government Israel responds with an exaggerated staggering properly. The media treatment does not then the bottom section (the charge of stealing body by Israelis on Palestinians killed by Israeli army), but only the "tensions" between Israel and Sweden. There are dozens of times in the French media. For example, on the point: "Israel rising tone against Sweden after an article deemed anti-Semitic " on the bottom of the article, like all newspapers, it is only mentioned "Aftonbladet does, however, no evidence, editor saying he authorized the release because the case "raises a number of pertinent questions."

"We are not asking for an apology from the Swedish government, we want to share a conviction (section)", said Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during the weekly cabinet meeting, according to an official source.

In Israel, hundreds of Israelis have signed an online petition against the Swedish furniture giant Ikea, according to Haaretz.

"The crisis will continue as the Swedish government has not changed his attitude about this anti-Semitic article. Whoever does not condemn is not necessarily welcome in Israel " told reporters that the Finance Minister Yuval Steinitz.

"The Swedish government can no longer remain silent. In the Middle Ages, it was spreading slander accusing Jews of preparing the unleavened bread of Easter with the blood of Christian children, and today it is the IDF (Israeli army) who are accused of killing Palestinians to remove their organs ", accused the minister.

These diplomatic tensions fall to worst, while the Swedish foreign minister Carl Bildt is expected to visit Israel in ten days. Sweden holds the rotating presidency of the European Union.

[...]

The Israeli foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, bluntly compared the attitude of Sweden in this case to the neutrality policy it adopted during the Second World War. "At that time also, Sweden refused to take action" against the Nazi genocide, "he alleged.

can search the archives about this article, we will not find any French media to go further than this sentence "Aftonbladet does, however, no evidence." Testimonies of Palestinians are, of course, never evidence.

Case closed.

Yet according Romandie, " Aftonbladet returns on organ trafficking Palestinians "August 23:

Two of its journalists have interviewed this week in the West Bank village of Imatten mother and brother Bilal Ghanem Achmad, who, by Swedish newspaper, is a 19 year old killed by Israeli soldiers 17 years ago, suspected of having been a leader in the first intifada.

Saadega Ghanem, Bilal's mother, said May 13, 1992, after killing the soldiers carried the body of his son to Israel by helicopter. Delivered a few days later the family, the mother says so that "Bilal was lying in a black bag. He no longer had any teeth. The body had been open from throat to belly and very poorly sewn.

The newspaper wrote that the younger brother of Bilal, Jalal Achmad Ghanem, 32, "believes that organs have been stolen."

Yet, CNN published a story Sept. 2: "Donor says he got Thousands history for kidney " According To

Scheper-Hughes, Who Is In The Final Stages of Writing a book is organ trafficking, Much Of The world's illicit traffic in Kidneys Can Be Traced to Israel.

"Israel Is The top," she said. "It has tentacles Reaching Out worldwide."

While the investigation is not "theft" of organs, only the illegal sale of organs. But it has traffic that "Israel is the top".

Incidentally, we learn that we are not talking about small sums. Bribes, kickbacks between 5000 and 10000 dollars, buying from donors between 5000 and 25000 dollars for a kidney, and, finally: A

Federal Complaint Against Levy-Itzhak Rosenbaum Said He Had Offered to Provide a new kidney on for a year of undercover FBI agent for about $ 160,000.

Especially, Kawther Salam publishes an article supporting and supplementing the Aftonbladet article: "The Body Snatchers of Israel ", translated into French by the network Tlaxcala ( The robbers dead Israel").

I think the Israeli government and all those suspected of being accomplices must answer some tough questions, before complaining of a well-written report appeared in a Swedish newspaper and talk about one case among thousands:

• Where are the bodies of two brothers Imad and Adel Awad Allah Al-Bireh, Ramallah district, killed 10 September 1998 on the farm near-by Akram Maswadeh of Hebron?
• Where are the bodies of Hani Ahmad and Kharboush Adel Mohammad Hadaideh killed June 6, 2003 to "Ateel", a town north of Tulkarem in the West Bank?
• Where is the body of Borhan Sarhan, who was killed Oct. 4, 2003 in the Tulkarem refugee camp?
• Where is the body of Issa Hassan Abbas, killed Oct. 9, 1994 in Jerusalem?
• Where is the body of Hisham Hamad, who was assassinated in the Gaza Strip, November 11, 1993?
• Where is the body of Salah Salem Jad Allah, murdered October 14, 1994?
• Where are the bodies of two Japanese nationals were murdered in 1972?
• is Israel able to prove that the bodies of those people, and those of hundreds or thousands of Palestinians buried in numbered graves of the Israeli army, have not been stolen?
• Why Israel buries victims of it its occupation in secret, in numbered graves, though there was no theft of their organs?

This note, in particular, involves a certain Dr. Yehuda Hiis: "Dr. Yehuda Hiss has gutted three teenagers in Gaza":

The boss of the department of pathology at Abu Kabir (the so-called Forensic Institute), Dr. Yehuda Hiss, said he had received the children without knowing their names, and they had all been killed by nails found in ammunition tanks (darts).

Hiss violated Israeli law when he accepted the children's bodies without knowing who they were and unbeknownst to their families, but it was not his concern. The three bodies were donated to the Palestinian Authority several days after their murder, stuffed with cotton.

But within days, it was already too late. The case had already more important than any other "tensions" between Israel and Sweden. The big show based imputation of anti-Semitism was perfectly orchestrated by Israel succeeded: nobody will look at allegations of the article, that is to say the theft of organs from Palestinians killed by army Israel and its possible connection with international traffic in organs which Israel would be "the top".

Bombshell: yesterday (Dec. 21), the revelation comes from a report of an Israeli television: Dr. Hiss recognizes the illegal removal of organs from Palestinians, the army also, quite stating that the practice would ceased.

Equally spectacular French newspaper does not back the information. I can find no trace of Figaro, or on the World, nor on Liberation. Only an unsigned telegram went on the AP wire news Le Nouvel Observateur: " Israel organs were collected from Palestinians . And there are names that had already crossed into the investigation of CNN and the ticket Kawther Salam.

Israel has acknowledged that in the 1990s, its forensic experts had collected the bodies of dead bodies, including the Palestinians, without permission of families.



[...] The author of the interview, Nancy Scheper-Hughes, a professor at Berkeley, decided to publish the interview in response to the controversy raised by the newspaper article, which was created diplomatic tensions. For this anthropologist, the symbolic practice of taking the enemy's skin has been reconsidered. For the Israeli Ministry of Health, the guidelines at the time were not clear.

Anglo-Saxon media talk about a bit more but, like the Guardian, the treatment is limited to "damage control". Thus, in the article "Doctor Israeli Pathologists allowed on harvested organs Without Consent "(already, the title is a nice understatement), it says:

The revelation, in a television documentary, IS Likely to generate anger in the Arab and Muslim world and Reinforce sinister stereotypes of Israel and Its attitude to Palestinians. Iran's state-run Press TV tonight Reported the Story, Illustrated With Photographs of dead or badly Injured Palestinians.

Two sentences, two crap. The fear is not that information is terribly serious and Israel has once again beat his record of meanness, but that it "generates anger in the Arab-Muslim and it reinforces the stereotypes against Israel. " Yet although Israel has launched the theme of anti-Semitism on the subject and sets the following link: "In the Middle Ages, it was spreading slander accusing Jews prepare the unleavened bread of Easter with children's blood Christians. " The subject is clearly not unique to Arab anti-Semitic stereotype, it is an act of unimaginable vileness perpetrated by the Israelis. And then the statement that it was taken over by Iranian television is able to emphasize the aspect of "suspicious" of these stereotypes "antisemitic", so it's good TV Israel has released this information.

At this point, it becomes grandiose. Almost no French media only contains information (produced by an Israeli television), but Iranian television devotes a story, and it would have the honor of our media not to broadcast these "stereotypes against Israel? There was a crime that should shock any human being, but it is likely to "generate anger" in the Arab-Muslim? The "Western" would no longer capable of any outrage?

Already, the courageous Iraqi journalist who has been in prison for throwing his shoes at the front of the war criminal George Bush was presented to us as "a hero of the Arab world." Swiss vote after racist against minarets, the only practical consequence that it was waved sanctions by Arab investors. As for Britain, she apologized because his justice issued an arrest warrant against a criminal Israeli war. So there would be heroes and anger exclusively Arab Europeans, themselves, would an apology.

In this history, the great circus of charging anti-Semitism, initially stirred by the Israeli government continues to be effective. The news "stinks" and nobody wants to touch.

Three days ago, the Point was able to inform us that in Israel, " organ donors will be priority recipients " (like what, the meanness does not ridicule). And, as was usually right retail Muslim religious prohibitions deemed aberrant much on this one, we avoid to link to a banned religious Jewish :

But at the same time, Jewish law prohibits the desecration of a corpse (nivoul Hameth). The body of a deceased person, as it hosted a holy soul, must be treated with utmost respect.



[...] Given the ban on desecrating the human body, it is forbidden to make a donation to an "organ bank" where there is no specific and immediate recipient.

It is also forbidden to donate a body for medical research or to enable medical students to engage in dissections.

MP Israeli Arab who says that the scandal of the theft of organs is another sign of racism in Israeli society ("inherent racism plaguing The Israeli Jewish Society "), is not cited. Yet it is quite clear: there is a shortfall of donors in Israel, probably due to a religious prohibition which proclaims "the prohibition of desecrating the human body," but you get the book on Palestinian corpses.

So what, a European survey on the new Israeli crime, stealing body at Palestinians killed by Israeli army is totally unthinkable? Will trade "privileged" with States outside Europe are not conditioned to respect minimum human rights?

In conclusion include the Arab Israeli MP Ahmed Teibi :

they accept this, imagine the magnitude of what they conceal.